Amicus Curiae Explained

Amicus Curiae Explained

An Amicus Curiae is both legal ideology, as well as the classification of an individual, associated within Courts – or legal venues – rooted within Common Law. An Amicus Curiae is defined as an individual – or individuals – who are petitioned and contracted to provide legal insight, supplemental judicial review, and a general provision of assistance with regard to a legal hearing. The requirement of an individual serving as an Amicus Curiae is subject to stringent guidelines and stipulations, which allow for the review submitted by the Amicus Curiae to remain objective and unbiased in nature. The Latin translation of the term ‘Amicus Curiae’ is defined as ‘A Friend of the Court’:

Requirements of an Amicus Curiae

The definition of Amicus Curiae ensures that the individual appointed to this position expresses that an Amicus Curiae remain free of prejudice with regard to the outcome of a case; as a result, an Amicus Curiae will be required to meet the following specifications:

An Amicus Curiae is not a witness; they are required to be free of any ties, involvement, and secondary gain with regard to the outcome of a court case

An Amicus Curiae’s services are not permitted to be – or have been – solicited or requested by either the Plaintiff or Defendant; the brief given by the Amicus Curiae is to be free of any bias

An Amicus Curiae is not permitted to benefit from the final ruling in any manner; in the event of cases involving specialized issues – or cases latent with subject matter towards which the prospective Amicus Curiae may be subjective – that individual will not be permitted to be eligible to serve as an Amicus Curiae

An Amicus Curiae’s brief is prohibited from altering the verdict of the hearing as a result of status or stature; the content of the brief – and that alone – are permissible to effect the final ruling of the case

Amicus Curiae Legislation

The following legislative acts have been instituted with regard to the act of Amicus Curiae; these stipulations are expressed within Rule 37(1) of the ‘Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States’ statute of guidelines:

A brief set forth by an Amicus Curiae, which is oftentimes regard as an ‘Amicus Brief’ is requested in order to provide for additional legal insight and case review in order to render the most constitutional and fair ruling

Subsequent to the receipt of an Amicus Brief, the jurisdictional court retains the judicial discretion regulating the admissibility and viability of the review set forth by the contracted Amicus Curiae

Amicus Curiae and Common Law

Within the legal field of Common Law, the procedure of judicial review undertakes a methodology of legal hierarchy with regard to the management of legal matters. Courts classified as ‘lower courts’ are named as the legal venues in which the initial judgments and ruling were mandated, while courts named as ‘higher courts’ are typically the recipients of petitions with regard to the judicial discretion with regard to retrials and the appointment of supplemental judicial review through undertaking an Amicus Curiae

NEXT: Common Law Rule